Home | About Us | Contact Us | Get notifications | Help | A-Z Topic List |
Collected data from parole supervising organizations about the organizational structure of the agencies, staffing, supervision levels of offenders, and whether the parole agency had a role in considering prisoners for release, setting the conditions of supervision, and conducting parole revocation hearings. This collection was conducted one time in 2006. The census was sent to 68 respondents, including 50 central state reporters, the California Juvenile Justice Division, and the District of Columbia. Sixteen local Minnesota Community Corrections Act agencies were asked to provide information on staffing and supervision not available from the state.
On This Page | ![]() |
Collection Period | ![]() |
Methodology | ![]() |
The Census was sent to 68 respondents, including 50 central state reporters, the California Juvenile Justice Division, and the District of Columbia. Sixteen local Minnesota Community Corrections Act agencies were asked to provide information on staffing and supervision not available from the state.
Changes Over Time | ![]() |
One time collection
Related Topics | ![]() |
Additional Information | ![]() |
The 2006 Census of Adult Parole Supervising Agencies provided the sampling frame for the BJS Former Prisoner Survey.
Bureau of Justice StatisticsBJS Data Protection Guidelines BJS Statistical Principles and Practices Legal Policies and Disclaimers |
Web Site |
PartnersFederal Bureau of Investigation Federal Justice Statistics Resource Center National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD)
|