BJS: Bureau of Justice Statistics

Home  |  About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Help  |  A-Z Topic List
 
 
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
Home  |  Publications & Products

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables

Download spreadsheet version (.csv file)

Appendix table H. Most severe type of sentence received by defendants convicted of a felony, by SCPS jurisdiction, 2004

County (State) Percent of felony defendants
Incarceration   Nonincarceration
Total Prison Jail Total Probation Other
    Total 75 % 35 % 40 %   25 % 24 % 1 %
Jefferson (AL) 46 % 45 % 1 %   54 % 53 % 1 %
Maricopa (AZ) 54   36   18     46   47   0  
Pima (AZ) 63   40   23     37   36   1  
Alameda (CA) 92   22   70     8   8   0  
Contra Costa (CA) 96   17   79     4   3   1  
Los Angeles (CA) 80   36   44     20   20   --  
Orange (CA) 77   29   48     23   23   --  
Riverside (CA) 91   40   51     9   9   0  
San Bernardino (CA) 88 % 42 % 46 %   12 % 12 % -- %
San Diego (CA) 71   30   41     29   29   --  
San Mateo (CA) 99   35   65     1   1   0  
Santa Clara (CA) 86   27   60     14   14   0  
Broward (FL) 75   37   38     25   23   2  
Miami-Dade (FL) 78   9   69     22   18   4  
Palm Beach (FL) 83   25   59     17   9   8  
Pinellas (FL) 69   34   48     32   32   0  
Fulton (GA) 38 % 34 % 4 %   62 % 62 % 0 %
Honolulu (HI) 72   43   30     28   28   0  
Cook (IL) 57   49   8     43   38   5  
Marion (IN) 81   34   46     20   19   0  
Baltimore (MD) 72   44   28     28   28   0  
Montgomery (MD) 50   25   26     50   47   3  
Wayne (MI) 46   21   26     54   54   0  
Essex (NJ) 65   36   29     35   33   3  
Bronx (NY) 68 % 51 % 17 %   32 % 26 % 6 %
Kings (NY) 82   49   33     18   18   0  
Nassau (NY) 58   18   41     42   35   7  
Queens (NY) 64   40   24     36   31   5  
Westchester (NY) 66   47   19     34   23   11  
Franklin (OH) 62   49   14     38   38   0  
Montgomery (PA) 74   30   44     26   23   3  
Philadelphia (PA) 63   14   49     37   31   6  
Shelby (TN) 83 % 53 % 30 %   17 % 15 % 3 %
Dallas (TX) 53   29   24     47   47   1  
El Paso (TX) 60   41   19     40   39   1  
Harris (TX) 97   66   31     3   3   0  
Tarrant (TX) 76   50   25     24   24   1  
Travis (TX) 73   35   38     27   27   0  
Salt Lake (UT) 71   28   43     29   29   0  
Fairfax (VA) 50   31   19     50   50   0  
Note: Defendants receiving incarceration sentences that were
wholly suspended are included under probation. Sentences
to incarceration may have also included a probation term.
Sentences to incarceration or probation may have included
a fine, restitution, community service, treatment or other
court-ordered condition. Other sentences included fines,
restitution, community service or treatment oriented punishment.
--Less than 0.5%.

Source: State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS)
  See also Methodology.
Previous


Back to Top